Temp Header  
Our Mission Our Purpose Our Promise Our Prayer
 

 
 
 
   

Publications


WORLDNET.DAILY.COM

MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH
Medical group: Tell women about abortion-cancer risk

Coalition endorses requiring doctors to inform prospective patients of risk

Posted: November 12, 2003
1:27 p.m. Eastern

By Diana Lynne
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

The Catholic Medical Association has added its voice to growing support for legislation requiring abortion doctors to inform prospective patients about the increased risk of breast cancer associated with having an abortion.

Upholding its mission to abide by "the principles of the Catholic faith and morality as related to the science and practice of medicine," the coalition of Catholic physicians of the United States and Canada passed a resolution urging state legislators across the country to address the matter.

The CMA resolution declares:

"Whereas epidemiological evidence of an association between abortion and breast cancer has existed for almost a half century, "Whereas 29 out of 38 worldwide epidemiological studies show an increased risk of breast cancer of approximately 30 percent among women who have had an abortion, "Whereas all women undergoing abortion are entitled to full informed consent as to all risks including long term risks, "Therefore be it resolved that the Catholic Medical Association endorses the passage of state legislation to require abortionists to inform all women of their future increased vulnerability to breast cancer."

Minnesota and Texas lawmakers passed such informed-consent legislation earlier this year and Massachusetts is considering a similar measure. "It's tragic that some doctors have to be forced to reveal the breast cancer risk to their patients," commented Karen Malec, president of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer. "However, thousands of women have developed the disease because profiteers in the abortion and the cancer fundraising industries misrepresented the abortion-breast cancer research and concealed the risk from them for 46 years."

The resolution cites evidence supporting an abortion-breast cancer link, commonly known as the ABC link. Twenty-nine of 38 published studies conducted worldwide since 1957 show a positive association between the two. Seventeen of the 29 are statistically significant, which means there's a 95 percent certainty that the association is not by chance.

The CMA's endorsement follows a similar announcement by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, or AAPS, favoring disclosure to patients of the "highly plausible" relationship between abortion and increased risk of breast cancer.
"The AAPS believes that patients have the right to give or withhold fully informed consent before undergoing medical treatment. This includes notification of potential adverse effects," said AAPS executive director Jane Orient. "While there is a difference of medical opinion concerning the abortion-breast cancer link, there is a considerable volume of evidence supporting this link, which is, moreover, highly plausible. We believe that a reasonable person would want to be informed of the existence of this evidence before making her decision."

Four other medical organizations recognize the ABC link. They include the National Physicians Center for Family Resources, the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Breast Cancer Prevention Institute and The Polycarp Research Institute.

WorldNetDaily reported earlier this year that Dr. John M. Thorpe, an epidemiologist at the University of North Carolina's School of Public Health, and his colleagues called for informed consent following a study which examined a variety of physical and psychological consequences associated with abortion.

"A young woman with an unintended pregnancy clearly sacrifices the protective effect of a term delivery should she decide to abort and delay childbearing," wrote the authors of the study published in the January issue of Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. "Thus, we conclude that informed consent before induced abortion should include information about the subsequent risk of preterm delivery and depression."
WorldNetDaily has reported on the risk cited by Thorpe and his colleagues, known as the "protective effect" of full-term pregnancy: The sooner a woman has her first child, the lower her risk of developing breast cancer.

Groups such as Planned Parenthood attack the validity of the research and refuse to inform prospective abortion recipients of the existence, dismissing even the statistically significant findings as "misinformation" being used "as a weapon in the campaign against safe, legal abortion."

"Undaunted by the absence of compelling evidence associating induced abortion with a woman's risk of developing breast cancer, anti-choice extremists insist on making the connection anyway," says Planned Parenthood on its website.
Despite the overwhelming research supporting the association and the growing chorus of voices urging its promotion, major cancer-prevention organizations such as the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society, or ACS, downplay or deny the ABC link.

The ACS currently maintains on its website that "research studies have not found a cause-and-effect relationship between breast cancer and abortion." After admitting that the research on the link between induced abortions and breast cancer is not clear, it dismisses all 38 studies but one – known as the Melbye study – which it describes at length.

"I encourage the American Cancer Society and the rest of the cancer fund-raising establishment to come clean and abandon their paternalistic policy of censoring any research reporting a positive relationship between abortion and breast cancer," said Malec.

"Even a study labeled 'authoritative' and 'definitive' by the ACS and other cancer groups reports a 29 percent risk elevation for women under age 20 who procure abortions and a statistically significant 89 percent risk elevation for women obtaining abortions after 18 weeks gestation. Yet, the cancer establishment has effectively used the study to erase any notion from the minds of women that abortion might be unsafe."





EWTNfs "Living His Life Abundantly" Show on The Truth About Homosexuality with Jeff Satinover, Ph.D., M.D. and Richard P. Fitzgibbons, M.D. will premier on Sunday, Sept. 28.
This program discusses how homosexuality can be prevented and treated and the science which demonstrates that it is not genetically acquired. The program will be re-broadcast Monday at 10 PM, Tuesday at 2 PM and Thursday at 10 AM. Please check with your local cable station to verify schedules.

CATHOLIC NEWS SERVICE REPORTS ON DR. GENE DIAMOND IN ROME

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Economic and ideological concerns, particularly in favor of abortion, are having an increasing impact on biomedical research and on the presentation of research in medical journals, a U.S. physician told a Vatican meeting. "The culture of death, (which) has for the last 30 years clearly controlled the press and the media, now shows a sinister proclivity toward controlling the scientific literature," said Dr. Eugene F. Diamond, director of the Linacre Institute of the Catholic Medical Association. Diamond was one of the main speakers at the Pontifical Academy for Life's Feb. 24-26 general assembly on "The Ethics of Biomedical Research: For a Christian Vision." :Thanks to Dr. Clem Cunningham for lining up press coverage on this important meeting AND for his constant tracking of major news stories and spreading the word - particularly NEJM and AMA articles.

The National Catholic Register
August 24-30, 2003. page one
Terri Schiavo's Bishop Warns Against Removing Feeding Tube

by STEPHEN VINCENT
Register Correspondent

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. - A day after the bishop of St. Petersburg, stated that removal of a feeding tube from a 39-year-old Florida woman who suffered severe brain damage in 1990 cannot be justified at this time by Church teaching, the woman, Terri Schiavo, was moved from a nursing home to a hospital under emergency medical circumstances.

A family spokeswoman said Schiavo's parents were not notified until 24 hours after the move, which took place Aug. 13, and that staff at Morton Plant Hospital in Clearwater, Fla., were working under the instructions of Michael Schiavo, the woman's husband and legal guardian, not to disclose her medical condition to her parents.

Disagreement over her medical condition and care has pitted Michael Schiavo against Terri's parents in a years-long legal battle for her life that could come to an end Aug. 25, when her feeding tube is scheduled to be removed by court order. Michael Schiavo is petitioning for removal of the tube.

Patricia Anderson, representing the parents and siblings of Terri Schiavo, filed an emergency motion for stay Aug. 13 in the Florida Supreme Court, requesting the court to halt further attempts to end Terri's life until the court decides if it will review the case.

Bishop Robert Lynch of St. Petersburg, the diocese in which Terri Schiavo has been residing, in a long-awaited statement Aug. 12 called the situation "tragic," noting that medical experts disagree about Schiavo's condition and chance of improvement.

Stating that Catholic teaching advises "presumption in favor of providing medically assisted nutrition and hydration to all patients as long as it is of sufficient benefit to outweigh the burden involved to the patient," the bishop "strongly recommend[edl" that both Schiavo s husband and her parents seek a dearer understanding of her actual physical conition."

Her parents should be allowed to pursue medical therapy that may improve her condition, he said. The statement leaves open the possibility of licitly removing the tube after further study.

Bishop Lynch added that it is "a much harder case" than many imagine and warned against "excessive rhetoric" such as using the word "murder" or calling the trial judges "murderers."

A more strongly worded statement was released in late July by the Catholic Medical Association, which said that removing Schiavo's tube would cross the line from allowing death to causing death and "cannot be justified by currently promulgated Catholic moral principles."

The Catholic Medical Association is an independent group and does not speak officially for the Church, though members seek to serve the Church by applying official teaching to the medical field.

Cutting off Schiavo's food and water also would set a dangerous precedent in the larger, public debate over assisted suicide and euthanasia, said the Catholic Medical Association's president, Dr. Robert Saxer, and Schiavo's father, Robert Schindler. A number of disabilities-rights group have rallied to preserve Schiavo's life.


"It's scary that a precedent is being set legally," Schindler said. "They're lowering the bar to encompass more persons who are incapacitated."

The Catholic Medical Association statement came just before a Florida appeals court granted a 30-day stay on the removal of Schiavo's feeding tube, allowing her parents time for another appeal to the state's Supreme Court. If the high court does not rule on the case it previously declined to hear, the fate of Tern Schiavo is scheduled to return Aug. 25 to Circuit Judge George Greer, who ordered her tube to be removed.

"It's a roller-coaster ride emotionally," Schindler said. "You don't know how long your child is going to be alive."

Schiavo collapsed at home on Feb. 25, 1990, and suffered severe brain damage from lack of oxygen. She cannot speak yet can breathe on her own and is not on a respirator. She has been found by some doctors and Flo9rida courts to be in a persistent vegetative state.

She is not brain-dead, her family points out, and often tries to communicate with visitors. A videotape that appears to show her smiling and responding to voices and objects can be viewed on the family's Web site, www.terrisfight.org.

But Michael Schiavo has testified that Terri once said she would not want to be kept alive artificially if she should ever become incapacitated. The court accepted this testimony as the expression of her will, in the absence of any written directives.

Schindlers' lawyer Anderson filed an appeal with the Florida Supreme Court on Aug. 4. She told the Register that there is "a genuine medical dispute about her diagnosis and prognosis" that should be further investigated.

The Catholic Medical Association's statement, signed by Saxer and Dr. Steven White, head of the group's Florida chapter, acknowledges that the authors cannot render judgment on the precise medical condition of Terri Schiavo since they have not examined her.

"However," the text continues, "we can and will comment on the application of Catholic moral principles which the Church has given us to determine when medically assisted nutrition and hydration can legitimately be withdrawn in a patient who is not terminally ill or imminently dying."

Saxer, a retired pediatrician living in Fort Walton Beach, Fla., said that since Schiavo has no underlying illness and is not imminently dying, the Church's absolute ban on euthanasia should be invoked.

"If they remove the tube, she will die as a result of that action," he told the Register. "It will be a most liberal decision in favor of the 'right to die' that will have untold effects on our laws. The are trying to set the standard of life at whether a person can feed herself. Persistent vegetative state is very hard to diagnose and is often misdiagnosed. I think she should benefit from therapy and rehabilitation that she has not had in 13 years."

Citing the Catechism of the Catholic Church (No. 2277), the U.S. bishops' Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care (No. 58), a statement to U.S. bishops by Pope John Paul II during an ad limina visit and a 1998 statement on end-of-life care by the bishops of Florida, the Catholic Medical Association statement concludes:"The withdrawal of nutrition and hydration ... will result in her death. The tube feeding itself does not impose an excessive burden on the patient. [Removing the feeding tube] in this circumstance violates in its intention the distinction between 'causing death' and 'allowing death.'"


Judie Brown, head of the Stafford, Va.-based American Life League, told the Register: "Terri is critically impaired and disabled. To deny her food and drink at this time would be killing her, plain and simple."

In his statement Bishop Lynch said Catholic teaching does allow a feeding tube to be "withheld or withdrawn where that treatment itself is causing harm to the patient or is useless because the patient's death is imminent, as long as the patient is made comfortable." In Schiavo's case, he said, "it is not clear whether [the feeding tube] is delaying her dying process to no avail, is unreasonably burdensome for her and contrary to what she would wish if she could tell us." If the feeding is not helping her "or it is unreasonably burdensome for her and her family or her caregivers," it "could be seen as permissible" to remove the tube, he wrote.

Yet, he added, if the tube is removed "simply because she is not dying quickly enough and some believe she would be better off because of her low quality of life, this would be wrong."

Michael McCarron, executive director of the Florida Catholic Conference, the public-policy arm of the state's bishops, said that since the case was "a local matter" of the St. Petersburg Diocese, the conference would not make a separate statement. Saxer, who has worked in the past with the Florida Catholic Conference on medical ethics issues, told the Register that he hesitated to speak independently time was running out in Schiavo case. "We can give our organization's public statement based on published teachings of the Church he explained.

George Felos, a lawyer Michael Schiavo, insists removing the feeding tube we not be euthanasia, which he said he opposes. Citing his client's testimony regarding Terri's thoughts on artificial medical treatment, Felos called removing the feeding "her choice."

Terri Schiavo's family has begun a petition drive asking Florida Gov. Jeb Bush to intervene in the case. They say they have collected 22,000 signatures so far.

( Stephen Vincent writes from Wallingford, Connecticut)



   
     
    All Rights Reserved © 2007 by The Catholic Medical Association
 
Site by Lumen Web Design