
WORLDNET.DAILY.COM
MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH
Medical group: Tell women about abortion-cancer risk
Coalition endorses requiring doctors to inform prospective patients of
risk
Posted: November 12, 2003
1:27 p.m. Eastern
By Diana Lynne
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
The Catholic Medical Association has added its voice to growing support
for legislation requiring abortion doctors to inform prospective patients
about the increased risk of breast cancer associated with having an abortion.
Upholding its mission to abide by "the principles of the Catholic
faith and morality as related to the science and practice of medicine," the
coalition of Catholic physicians of the United States and Canada passed
a resolution urging state legislators across the country to address the
matter.
The CMA resolution declares:
"Whereas epidemiological evidence of an association between abortion
and breast cancer has existed for almost a half century, "Whereas
29 out of 38 worldwide epidemiological studies show an increased risk of
breast cancer of approximately 30 percent among women who have had an abortion, "Whereas
all women undergoing abortion are entitled to full informed consent as
to all risks including long term risks, "Therefore be it resolved
that the Catholic Medical Association endorses the passage of state legislation
to require abortionists to inform all women of their future increased vulnerability
to breast cancer."
Minnesota and Texas lawmakers passed such informed-consent legislation
earlier this year and Massachusetts is considering a similar measure. "It's
tragic that some doctors have to be forced to reveal the breast cancer
risk to their patients," commented Karen Malec, president of the Coalition
on Abortion/Breast Cancer. "However, thousands of women have developed
the disease because profiteers in the abortion and the cancer fundraising
industries misrepresented the abortion-breast cancer research and concealed
the risk from them for 46 years."
The resolution cites evidence supporting an abortion-breast cancer link,
commonly known as the ABC link. Twenty-nine of 38 published studies conducted
worldwide since 1957 show a positive association between the two. Seventeen
of the 29 are statistically significant, which means there's a 95 percent
certainty that the association is not by chance.
The CMA's endorsement follows a similar announcement by the Association
of American Physicians and Surgeons, or AAPS, favoring disclosure to patients
of the "highly plausible" relationship between abortion and increased
risk of breast cancer.
"The AAPS believes that patients have the right to give or withhold
fully informed consent before undergoing medical treatment. This includes
notification of potential adverse effects," said AAPS executive director
Jane Orient. "While there is a difference of medical opinion concerning
the abortion-breast cancer link, there is a considerable volume of evidence
supporting this link, which is, moreover, highly plausible. We believe
that a reasonable person would want to be informed of the existence of
this evidence before making her decision."
Four other medical organizations recognize the ABC link. They include the National
Physicians Center for Family Resources, the American
Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Breast
Cancer Prevention Institute and The Polycarp
Research Institute.
WorldNetDaily reported
earlier this year that Dr. John M. Thorpe, an epidemiologist at the University
of North Carolina's School of Public Health, and his colleagues called
for informed consent following a study which examined a variety of physical
and psychological consequences associated with abortion.
"A young woman with an unintended pregnancy clearly sacrifices the
protective effect of a term delivery should she decide to abort and delay
childbearing," wrote the authors of the study published in the January
issue of Obstetrical & Gynecological
Survey. "Thus, we conclude that informed consent before induced
abortion should include information about the subsequent risk of preterm
delivery and depression."
WorldNetDaily
has reported on the risk cited by Thorpe and his colleagues, known
as the "protective effect" of full-term pregnancy: The sooner
a woman has her first child, the lower her risk of developing breast cancer.
Groups such as Planned
Parenthood attack the validity of the research and refuse to inform
prospective abortion recipients of the existence, dismissing even the statistically
significant findings as "misinformation" being used "as
a weapon in the campaign against safe, legal abortion."
"Undaunted by the absence of compelling evidence associating induced
abortion with a woman's risk of developing breast cancer, anti-choice extremists
insist on making the connection anyway," says Planned Parenthood on
its website.
Despite the overwhelming research supporting the association and the growing
chorus of voices urging its promotion, major cancer-prevention organizations
such as the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society,
or ACS, downplay or deny the ABC link.
The ACS currently maintains on its website that "research studies
have not found a cause-and-effect relationship between breast cancer and
abortion." After admitting that the research on the link between induced
abortions and breast cancer is not clear, it dismisses all 38 studies but
one – known as the Melbye study – which it describes at length.
"I encourage the American Cancer Society and the rest of the cancer
fund-raising establishment to come clean and abandon their paternalistic
policy of censoring any research reporting a positive relationship between
abortion and breast cancer," said Malec.
"Even a study labeled 'authoritative' and 'definitive' by the ACS
and other cancer groups reports a 29 percent risk elevation for women under
age 20 who procure abortions and a statistically significant 89 percent
risk elevation for women obtaining abortions after 18 weeks gestation.
Yet, the cancer establishment has effectively used the study to erase any
notion from the minds of women that abortion might be unsafe."
EWTNfs "Living His Life Abundantly" Show
on The Truth About Homosexuality with Jeff Satinover, Ph.D.,
M.D. and Richard P. Fitzgibbons, M.D. will premier on Sunday, Sept. 28.
This program discusses how homosexuality can be prevented and treated and
the science which demonstrates that it is not genetically acquired. The program
will be re-broadcast Monday at 10 PM, Tuesday at 2 PM and Thursday at 10
AM. Please check with your local cable station to verify schedules.
CATHOLIC NEWS SERVICE REPORTS ON DR. GENE DIAMOND IN ROME
VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Economic and ideological concerns, particularly in
favor of abortion, are having an increasing impact on biomedical research
and on the presentation of research in medical journals, a U.S. physician
told a Vatican meeting. "The culture of death, (which) has for the last
30 years clearly controlled the press and the media, now shows a sinister
proclivity toward controlling the scientific literature," said Dr. Eugene
F. Diamond, director of the Linacre Institute of the Catholic Medical Association.
Diamond was one of the main speakers at the Pontifical Academy for Life's
Feb. 24-26 general assembly on "The Ethics of Biomedical Research: For
a Christian Vision." :Thanks to Dr. Clem Cunningham for lining up press
coverage on this important meeting AND for his constant tracking of major
news stories and spreading the word - particularly NEJM and AMA articles.
The National Catholic Register
August 24-30, 2003. page one
Terri Schiavo's Bishop Warns Against Removing Feeding Tube
by STEPHEN VINCENT
Register Correspondent
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. - A day after the bishop of St. Petersburg, stated that
removal of a feeding tube from a 39-year-old Florida woman who suffered severe
brain damage in 1990 cannot be justified at this time by Church teaching,
the woman, Terri Schiavo, was moved from a nursing home to a hospital under
emergency medical circumstances.
A family spokeswoman said Schiavo's parents were not notified until 24 hours
after the move, which took place Aug. 13, and that staff at Morton Plant
Hospital in Clearwater, Fla., were working under the instructions of Michael
Schiavo, the woman's husband and legal guardian, not to disclose her medical
condition to her parents.
Disagreement over her medical condition and care has pitted Michael Schiavo
against Terri's parents in a years-long legal battle for her life that could
come to an end Aug. 25, when her feeding tube is scheduled to be removed
by court order. Michael Schiavo is petitioning for removal of the tube.
Patricia Anderson, representing the parents and siblings of Terri Schiavo,
filed an emergency motion for stay Aug. 13 in the Florida Supreme Court,
requesting the court to halt further attempts to end Terri's life until the
court decides if it will review the case.
Bishop Robert Lynch of St. Petersburg, the diocese in which Terri Schiavo
has been residing, in a long-awaited statement Aug. 12 called the situation "tragic," noting
that medical experts disagree about Schiavo's condition and chance of improvement.
Stating that Catholic teaching advises "presumption in favor of providing
medically assisted nutrition and hydration to all patients as long as it
is of sufficient benefit to outweigh the burden involved to the patient," the
bishop "strongly recommend[edl" that both Schiavo s husband and
her parents seek a dearer understanding of her actual physical conition."
Her parents should be allowed to pursue medical therapy that may improve
her condition, he said. The statement leaves open the possibility of licitly
removing the tube after further study.
Bishop Lynch added that it is "a much harder case" than many
imagine and warned against "excessive rhetoric" such as using the
word "murder" or calling the trial judges "murderers."
A more strongly worded statement was released in late July by the
Catholic Medical Association, which said that removing Schiavo's tube would
cross the line from allowing death to causing death and "cannot be justified
by currently promulgated Catholic moral principles."
The Catholic Medical Association is an independent group and does not speak
officially for the Church, though members seek to serve the Church by applying
official teaching to the medical field.
Cutting off Schiavo's food and water also would set a dangerous precedent
in the larger, public debate over assisted suicide and euthanasia, said the
Catholic Medical Association's president, Dr. Robert Saxer, and Schiavo's
father, Robert Schindler. A number of disabilities-rights group have rallied
to preserve Schiavo's life.
"It's scary that a precedent is being set legally," Schindler
said. "They're lowering the bar to encompass more persons who are incapacitated."
The Catholic Medical Association statement came just before a Florida
appeals court granted a 30-day stay on the removal of Schiavo's feeding tube,
allowing her parents time for another appeal to the state's Supreme Court.
If the high court does not rule on the case it previously declined to hear,
the fate of Tern Schiavo is scheduled to return Aug. 25 to Circuit Judge
George Greer, who ordered her tube to be removed.
"It's a roller-coaster ride emotionally," Schindler said. "You
don't know how long your child is going to be alive."
Schiavo collapsed at home on Feb. 25, 1990, and suffered severe brain damage
from lack of oxygen. She cannot speak yet can breathe on her own and is not
on a respirator. She has been found by some doctors and Flo9rida courts to
be in a persistent vegetative state.
She is not brain-dead, her family points out, and often tries to communicate
with visitors. A videotape that appears to show her smiling and responding
to voices and objects can be viewed on the family's Web site, www.terrisfight.org.
But Michael Schiavo has testified that Terri once said she would not want
to be kept alive artificially if she should ever become incapacitated. The
court accepted this testimony as the expression of her will, in the absence
of any written directives.
Schindlers' lawyer Anderson filed an appeal with the Florida Supreme Court
on Aug. 4. She told the Register that there is "a genuine medical dispute
about her diagnosis and prognosis" that should be further investigated.
The Catholic Medical Association's statement, signed by Saxer and
Dr. Steven White, head of the group's Florida chapter, acknowledges that
the authors cannot render judgment on the precise medical condition of Terri
Schiavo since they have not examined her.
"However," the text continues, "we can and will comment
on the application of Catholic moral principles which the Church has given
us to determine when medically assisted nutrition and hydration can legitimately
be withdrawn in a patient who is not terminally ill or imminently dying."
Saxer, a retired pediatrician living in Fort Walton Beach, Fla., said that
since Schiavo has no underlying illness and is not imminently dying, the
Church's absolute ban on euthanasia should be invoked.
"If they remove the tube, she will die as a result of that action," he
told the Register. "It will be a most liberal decision in favor of the
'right to die' that will have untold effects on our laws. The are trying
to set the standard of life at whether a person can feed herself. Persistent
vegetative state is very hard to diagnose and is often misdiagnosed. I think
she should benefit from therapy and rehabilitation that she has not had in
13 years."
Citing the Catechism of the Catholic Church (No. 2277), the U.S. bishops'
Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care (No. 58), a statement
to U.S. bishops by Pope John Paul II during an ad limina visit and a 1998
statement on end-of-life care by the bishops of Florida, the Catholic Medical
Association statement concludes:"The withdrawal of nutrition and hydration
... will result in her death. The tube feeding itself does not impose an
excessive burden on the patient. [Removing the feeding tube] in this circumstance
violates in its intention the distinction between 'causing death' and 'allowing
death.'"
Judie Brown, head of the Stafford, Va.-based American Life League, told the
Register: "Terri is critically impaired and disabled. To deny her food
and drink at this time would be killing her, plain and simple."
In his statement Bishop Lynch said Catholic teaching does allow a feeding
tube to be "withheld or withdrawn where that treatment itself is causing
harm to the patient or is useless because the patient's death is imminent,
as long as the patient is made comfortable." In Schiavo's case, he said, "it
is not clear whether [the feeding tube] is delaying her dying process to
no avail, is unreasonably burdensome for her and contrary to what she would
wish if she could tell us." If the feeding is not helping her "or
it is unreasonably burdensome for her and her family or her caregivers," it "could
be seen as permissible" to remove the tube, he wrote.
Yet, he added, if the tube is removed "simply because she is not dying
quickly enough and some believe she would be better off because of her low
quality of life, this would be wrong."
Michael McCarron, executive director of the Florida Catholic Conference,
the public-policy arm of the state's bishops, said that since the case was "a
local matter" of the St. Petersburg Diocese, the conference would not
make a separate statement. Saxer, who has worked in the past with the Florida
Catholic Conference on medical ethics issues, told the Register that he hesitated
to speak independently time was running out in Schiavo case. "We can
give our organization's public statement based on published teachings of
the Church he explained.
George Felos, a lawyer Michael Schiavo, insists removing the feeding tube
we not be euthanasia, which he said he opposes. Citing his client's testimony
regarding Terri's thoughts on artificial medical treatment, Felos called
removing the feeding "her choice."
Terri Schiavo's family has begun a petition drive asking Florida Gov. Jeb
Bush to intervene in the case. They say they have collected 22,000 signatures
so far.
( Stephen Vincent writes from Wallingford, Connecticut)
|